Speudi Algo:

1) Classify solution(Function) by pertinence to resolve objectives (priorized or not)

2) For eah solution(Function) find best expertise (actor) and create first schedule with following contraints:

- not same actor in same time

- not same impacted environment in same time

- valid needs/supports/implies functions

- find the better expertise (the better actor for the function)

Status: Incomplete (the objective "prevent Potentiality 6" is not linked to an objective)

Pertinence indice calcul:

9 objectives to resolve:

Objective 1 (prevent Potentiality 1) : 0.92 * 1 * 0.66 = 0.6072 => 60,72 %

Objective 2 (prevent Potentiality 2): 0.76 * 0.7 * 0.42 = 0.22344 => 22,344 %

Objective 3 (prevent Potentiality 3): 0.78 * 0.8 * 0.96 = 0.59904 => 59,904 %

Objective 4 (prevent Potentiality 4): 0.12 * 0.56 = 0.0672 => 6.72 % (precaution principle => always take the shortest path)

Objective 5 (prevent Potentiality 5): 0.81 * 0.72 * 0.78 = 0.454896 => 45,4896 %

Objective 6 (prevent Potentiality 7): 0.81 * 0.86 * 0.18 * 0.78 * 0.54 = 0,0528134256 => 5.28134256 %

Objective 7 (treat Actuality 1): 0.92 * 1 * 0.72 = 0.6624 => 66.24 %

Objective 8 (treat Actuality 2): 0.76 * 0.7 * 0.78 = 0,41496 => 41,496 %

Objective 9 (treat Actuality 3): 0.78 * 0.8 * 0.74 = 0.46176 => 46,176 %

Objective 10 (treat Treat: Stop Initiative to stop): 1 * 1 * 1 = 1 => 100 %

Pertinence Indice = (0.6072 + 0.22344 + 0.59904 + 0.0672 + 0.454896 + 0.0528134256 + 0.6624 + 0.41496 + 0.46176 + 1) / 10 = 4.5437094256 / 10 = 0.45437094256 => 0.45 = 45 %

Expertise indice calcul:

9 objectives to resolve:

Objective 1 (prevent Potentiality 1) => Actor Function 1 (by Actor 1Bis) + (pre/support (by Actor 1)/post) : (0.88 + 0.76 + 0.68 + 0.56) / 4 = 0.72 => 72 %

Objective 2 (prevent Potentiality 2) => Actor Function 2.1 (by Actor 2) : 0.41 => 41 %

Objective 3 (prevent Potentiality 3) => Actor Function 4 (by Actor 4): 0.77 => 77 %

Objective 4 (prevent Potentiality 4) => Actor Function 4 (by Actor 4): 0.77 => 77 %

Objective 5 (prevent Potentiality 5) => Actor Function 6 (by Actor 6) : 0.83 => 83 %

Objective 6 (prevent Potentiality 7) => Actor Function 6 (by Actor 6) : 0.83 => 83 %

Objective 7 (treat Actuality 1) => Actor Function 1 (by Actor 1Bis) + (pre/support (by Actor 1)/post) : (0.88 + 0.76 + 0.68 + 0.56) / 4 = 0.72 => 72 %

Objective 8 (treat Actuality 2) => Actor Function 2.1 (by Actor 2) : 0.41 => 41 %

Objective 9 (treat Actuality 3) => Actor Function 4 (by Actor 4): 0.77 => 77 %

Objective 10 (treat Treat: Stop Initiative to stop) => Support Funtion (by Actor 3) + Stop Initiative Intervention (by Ken Addams) : (0.93 + 1) / 2 = 0.965 => 96.5 %

Expertise Indice = (0.72 + 0.41 + 0.77 + 0.77 + 0.83 + 0.83 + 0.72 + 0.41 + 0.77 + 0.965) / 10 = 7.195 / 10 = 0.7195 => 0.72 = 72%

Browser not supported